{"id":2452,"date":"2012-02-15T11:15:21","date_gmt":"2012-02-15T11:15:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.dwc.knaw.nl\/?page_id=2452"},"modified":"2012-02-15T11:25:42","modified_gmt":"2012-02-15T11:25:42","slug":"huygens-and-the-improvement-of-the-telescope","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/dwc.knaw.nl\/en\/biografie\/christiaan-huygensweb\/instrumenten-en-uitvindingen\/huygens-and-the-improvement-of-the-telescope\/","title":{"rendered":"Huygens and the improvement of the telescope"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After the \u2018invention\u2019 of the telescope in 1608, the greatest Dutch  contribution to the development of this instrument was made by  Christiaan Huygens (1629-1695) together with his brother Constantijn  Huygens Junior (1628-1697).<\/p>\n\n<h2><strong>Huygens\u2019 contribution to perfecting the telescope<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p>It  was Christiaan who would make the greatest theoretical contribution to  the development of the telescope, mainly thanks to the invention of the  Huygens ocular (named after himself) and the aerial (tubeless)  telescope. He was also the first to reveal the potential of a  micrometer.<\/p>\n\n<p>Strongly inspired by their father Constantijn Huygens  Senior, himself particularly interested in optical innovations, the  Huygens brothers began grinding object lenses in 1654. A year earlier  they had already had a telescope made by a certain \u2018Master Paulus\u2019 of  Arnhem. Because they found this instrument disappointing, they decided  to make one themselves. Christiaan Huygens in particular wished to use  such a telescope for astronomical observations.<\/p>\n\n<p>After consulting a  number of well-known opticians, such as the scholar Gerard van  Gutschoven of Leuven, the instrument maker Johannes Wiesel of Augsburg  and the optician Jan de Wyck of Delft, they finally turned to the \u2018<em>pre-eminent tradesman in the country for this type of work\u2019<\/em>,  the instrument maker Caspar Calthof of Dordrecht. The latter provided  the Huygens brothers with their first grinding plates and other  necessary equipment. In the spring of 1655, the first practicable  telescope of 12 feet (approx. 3.7 meters) in length was ready. Soon  after, Christiaan would use it to observe Saturn and discover a new  moon, which would later be named Titan.<\/p>\n\n<p>Christiaan was extremely satisfied with his new telescope. He wrote to a correspondent: <em>\u2018I  recently built a telescope of 12 feet in length, and I believe you  would be hard put to find a better, as I am sure that no one before has  seen the wonder that I observed with it recently\u2019<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n<p>As a  result of his prolonged observation of the planet Saturn, Christiaan  Huygens also developed a new theory for the \u2018ears of Saturn\u2019, first  observed by Galileo, which he was able to prove was a ring around  Saturn. From March 1656 he had a new telescope at his disposal to test  his hypothesis. This telescope was 24 feet in length (approx. 7.3  meters) and once again, the object lens was ground by the brothers  themselves.\u00a0 This long telescope was raised in the garden of the  Huygens\u2019 residence using pulleys and a mast.<\/p>\n\n<p>Huygens published his discoveries in 1659 in a book entitled <em>Systema Saturnium<\/em>. This publication also contains his first description of the workings of a <strong>micrometer<\/strong> in an astronomical telescope. In this telescope, the object lens  creates a true image which is viewed through the ocular lens. By fitting  a distance gauge onto the true image, the position of one heavenly body  in relation to another could be determined with great accuracy.<\/p>\n\n<h2><strong>The exterior of Christiaan\u2019s telescope<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p>Extremely  satisfied with the progress he had made, Christiaan took the telescope  with which he had made his discoveries with him wherever he travelled.  The brothers originally mounted their lenses in simple tin tubes (an  example can still be viewed in the Boerhaave Museum), and the \u2018Admovere\u2019  object lens (with which Christiaan discovered the moon Titan) was  originally placed in such a tin tube too.<\/p>\n\n<p>However, in October  1655, during a visit to Paris, Christiaan ordered a brand new telescope  tube from an \u2018artisan\u2019, built according to the current French fashion.  The main tube was now made of very thin wood covered in morocco leather  (probably red) stamped with gold. The four telescopic tubes were clad  with green parchment \u2018<em>as I have seen that is the way they do it here<\/em>\u2019.  The new telescope was less than a quarter of the weight of the old  tube. When fully retracted the length was now about 3 feet (approx. 91  cm).<\/p>\n\n<p>However, in the end, the new tube proved to be rather  unpractical. It tended to bend and collapse if only supported at one  point. \u2018<em>A solution will need to be found for this problem<\/em>\u2019,  wrote Christiaan to his brother in 1656. However, as far as the lenses  were concerned, their telescope was unequalled, according to Christiaan:  \u2018<em>Now that I have informed everyone of the discovery of Saturn\u2019s  moon [&#8230;] they cannot deny that my telescope is the best that ever was  built<\/em>\u2019.<\/p>\n\n<h2><strong>Hevelius and Divini protest against Huygens<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p>Huygens\u2019  claim that his telescope was better than all the others did not remain  uncontested. For example, the astronomer Johannes Hevelius, who had been  visited by younger brother Philippus Huygens in March 1656, was  furious. Not only had Philippus labelled him an inferior lens grinder in  his private correspondence with his brothers, Christiaan\u2019s declaration,  in the <em>Systema Saturnium<\/em>, that his new telescope was now the norm for all observers could not go unchallenged.<\/p>\n\n<p>The  Italian telescope-builder Eustachio Divini fought the hardest against  Huygens\u2019 claim that he made the best telescopes. In 1661, Divini  published a small book, together with the Jesuit Honor\u00e9 Fabri, in which  he explained his own ideas about Saturn. However, although Divini was  probably right &#8216;that his telescopes were of similar quality to Huygens\u2019,  he eventually lost the battle.<\/p>\n\n<h2><strong>Christiaan Huygens\u2019 aerial telescope (1684)<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p>Around  1650, it was discovered that if lenses were used with a small radius of  curvature, the problem of lens deviation (such as dispersion and  distortion) could for a large part be\u00a0 removed. The occurrence of these  image distortions was a particular problem with astronomical telescopes.  However, such a small radius of curvature of the lenses irrevocably led  to long focal lengths, resulting in almost unmanageably long  telescopes. Only very experienced users were able to handle such  telescopes.<\/p>\n\n<p>To get around the problem of wind sensitivity and the  unhandiness of the long telescopes, Christiaan Huygens invented the  so-called \u2018aerial (tubeless) telescope\u2019, of which he published a  description in the book <em><strong>Astroscopia compendiaria<\/strong><\/em> in 1684.\nHuygens  limited this instrument to a large object lens and an eyepiece. The  object lens was hoisted up a mast in a holder and joined to an eyepiece  or ocular lens by a rope. A small oil lamp was used to make it easier to  aim.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After the \u2018invention\u2019 of the telescope in 1608, the greatest Dutch contribution to the development of this instrument was made by Christiaan Huygens (1629-1695) together with his brother Constantijn Huygens Junior (1628-1697). Huygens\u2019 contribution to perfecting the telescope It was Christiaan who would make the greatest theoretical contribution to the development of the telescope, mainly [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"parent":66,"menu_order":1,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dwc.knaw.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2452"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dwc.knaw.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dwc.knaw.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dwc.knaw.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dwc.knaw.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2452"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/dwc.knaw.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2452\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2458,"href":"https:\/\/dwc.knaw.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2452\/revisions\/2458"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dwc.knaw.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/66"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dwc.knaw.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2452"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}